|
Case Insight
· 2 min read

Pharmaceutical Goods Dispute with Chinese Supplier…

A foreign buyer ordered vitamin C from a Chinese supplier — and the shipment fell short on both quantity and quality. A case on multiple breaches and…

China Legal Hub

Share
TribunalCIETAC (China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission)
Date of Award1997-08-18
Docket No.CISG/1997/26
PartiesChinese Seller (Respondent) v. Germany ( Buyer (Claimant)
Goods/SectorVitamin C
Key IssuesFundamental breach; Damages; Foreseeability of damages; Cover transactions; Substitute goods; Mitigation of loss; Interest
CISG ArticlesArt. 25, 26, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 31, 45(1), 49(1), 67(2)

Facts

On 26 July 1996, Claimant [Buyer] of Germany and Respondent [Seller] of the People's Republic of China concluded a contract for [Buyer] to purchase 30 tons of Vitamin C from [Seller]. The unit price was US $5.15 per kilogram CIF Hamburg; the total contract price was US $154,500. The shipping date was August 1996. The shipping harbor was Dalian harbor of the People's Republic of China, and the destination harbor was Hamburg, Germany. On 12 August and 20 August 1996, [Buyer] reminded [Seller] t...

Legal Issues

This case raised the following questions under the CISG:

  • Did the breach constitute a "fundamental breach" under CISG Art. 25? The tribunal assessed whether the non-performance substantially deprived the injured party of its contractual expectations — the threshold for invoking avoidance remedies.

  • How should damages be calculated? The tribunal considered the concrete method (Art. 75, based on cover transactions) and the abstract method (Art. 76, based on current market price) to determine the appropriate measure of compensation.

  • Were the claimed losses foreseeable at the time of contracting? Under CISG Art. 74, damages are limited to losses that the breaching party foresaw or ought to have foreseen as a possible consequence of the breach.

  • Did the injured party fulfill its duty to mitigate? Under CISG Art. 77, the injured party must take reasonable measures to reduce its losses. Failure to mitigate can reduce the damage award.

  • Is the injured party entitled to interest on sums in arrears? Under CISG Art. 78, a party who fails to pay the price or any other sum in arrears is liable for interest, without prejudice to any claim for damages.

Practical Takeaways for International Businesses

  1. Document your losses from day one. CIETAC's ability to award appropriate damages depends on the quality of evidence. Maintain contemporaneous records of all communications, market prices, and cover transactions.

  2. Foreseeability limits your recovery. Under CISG Art. 74, you can only recover losses that were foreseeable at the time of contracting. Make sure your contract clearly allocates risk for consequential damages.

Supplier problem? Get an answer on your own case.

Describe what happened and Ask CLH, our AI assistant, explains your options in minutes. A PRC lawyer can take it from there with a fixed-fee assessment.

Email us directly:support@chinalegalhub.com

This case insight is published by China Legal Hub (www.chinalegalhub.com) for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For professional contract review services, please visit our website.

Related articles

Case Insight

The Broadcasting equipment case: A CIETAC Arbitration Case Study

Defects were found in imported broadcasting equipment from Canada — but the buyer waited too long to complain. A case on late defect notice and whether silence can waive your rights under the CISG.

Case Insight

The Chilling Press Case: Defective Machinery and the Limits of Avoidance

The machinery arrived but never worked properly. The buyer wanted out — but had they inspected it in time? A case on defective machinery, inspection timelines, and the limits of contract avoidance.

Case Insight

The Valve Case: When a German Seller Fails to Deliver Industrial Equipment

A German seller failed to deliver industrial valves to a Chinese buyer. The buyer declared fundamental breach and walked away. A case on non-delivery of industrial equipment and damages under the CISG.

Industry

Chinese Factory Won't Sign Your NNN Agreement? 5 Lessons From a China Lawyer

Most Chinese factories refuse an NNN, or push for a tiny penalty, because the draft is one-sided. A PRC-licensed attorney explains five practical lessons: balance the agreement, carve out the factory's own technology, set a reasonable penalty under Chinese law, verify suppliers first, and never sample with more than two factories at once.

Industry

How to Choose China NNN Legal Services: Four VACE Steps

Four questions to ask before buying China NNN legal services: verify the receiving party, consider affiliates, tailor the agreement and check the signing.